2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1986 Chevrolet Astro

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Chevrolet Astro (183 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 995 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Chevrolet Astro (338 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 1986 Chevrolet Astro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1986 Chevrolet Astro has manual transmission. 1986 Chevrolet Astro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: