2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1986 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 580 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1986 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1986 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | AL2 | Cougar |
Year Released | 2001 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1480 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |