2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Holden Apollo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Holden Apollo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 305 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Holden Apollo. (172 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Holden Apollo.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | AL2 | Apollo |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1205 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |