2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1992 Jaguar XJ220

To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Jaguar XJ220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Jaguar XJ220 would be higher. At 3,492 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 467 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Jaguar XJ220 weights approximately 522 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Jaguar XJ220 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Jaguar XJ220. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 1992 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1992 Jaguar XJ220 has manual transmission. 1992 Jaguar XJ220 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: