2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 200 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 1992 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | AL2 | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2001 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1100 kg |