2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover Range Rover (190 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1190 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Rover Range Rover. (306 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Rover Range Rover.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Audi | Rover |
Model | AL2 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 2001 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 306 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2090 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |