2001 Audi AL2 vs. 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,134 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 500 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (249 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 1997 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | AL2 | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3134 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 249 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1400 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2720 mm |
