2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo
To start off, 2001 Audi AL2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Daewoo Rezzo would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 370 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo. (149 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Daewoo Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2000 Daewoo Rezzo | |
| Make | Audi | Daewoo |
| Model | AL2 | Rezzo |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1761 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1270 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2610 mm |
