2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2002 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2002 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 4,570 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 805 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac DeVille (406 Nm) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2002 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | AL2 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 406 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1705 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2900 mm |
