2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. (319 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Wrangler. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 2002 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | AL2 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2001 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 319 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2380 mm |