2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2003 Avanti Studebaker
To start off, 2003 Avanti Studebaker is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 5,952 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Avanti Studebaker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (321 HP @ 3300 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Avanti Studebaker weights approximately 1775 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Avanti Studebaker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Avanti Studebaker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Avanti Studebaker (560 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2003 Avanti Studebaker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2003 Avanti Studebaker | |
Make | Audi | Avanti |
Model | AL2 | Studebaker |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 321 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 560 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2675 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3410 mm |