2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2003 Chrysler Concorde
To start off, 2003 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 678 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Concorde. (258 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Concorde.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2003 Chrysler Concorde | |
Make | Audi | Chrysler |
Model | AL2 | Concorde |
Year Released | 2001 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2736 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 258 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1578 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2880 mm |