2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 400 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | AL2 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2491 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 165 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 221 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1300 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2490 mm |
