2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2004 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1131 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Cherokee (360 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2004 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2004 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | AL2 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2776 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2031 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2660 mm |