2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2004 Mazda 3

To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (83 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 255 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (230 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 2004 Mazda 3 has manual transmission. 2004 Mazda 3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: