2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2004 Mazda 3
To start off, 2004 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 3 (144 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 3 weights approximately 323 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 3. (184 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2004 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | AL2 | 3 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 144 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1223 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2760 mm |