2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (207 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1075 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo XC90. (320 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo XC90.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | AL2 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2435 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1975 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2860 mm |
