2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2006 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 5,965 cc, 2006 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac CTS (400 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 325 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2006 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2006 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | AL2 | CTS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5965 cc |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 400 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 536 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2890 mm |
