2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2006 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,556 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (255 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 989 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (344 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2006 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | AL2 | SRX |
Year Released | 2001 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 344 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1889 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2960 mm |