2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2008 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2008 Cadillac XLR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 4,371 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac XLR (444 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 369 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac XLR should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac XLR weights approximately 660 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac XLR (561 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac XLR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2008 Cadillac XLR | |
| Make | Audi | Cadillac |
| Model | AL2 | XLR |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4371 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 444 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 561 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1560 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2690 mm |
