2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,899 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Impala (233 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 649 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Impala. (325 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Impala.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2009 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | AL2 | Impala |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3899 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 233 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1549 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2810 mm |
