2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Traverse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chevrolet Traverse weights approximately 361 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Traverse (366 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Traverse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2009 Chevrolet Traverse | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | AL2 | Traverse |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1261 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3030 mm |