2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (347 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1455 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (520 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | AL2 | Commander |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 347 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 520 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2355 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2790 mm |