2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2009 Mercury Milan
To start off, 2009 Mercury Milan is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,261 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercury Milan (160 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercury Milan should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercury Milan weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Milan. (212 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Milan.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2009 Mercury Milan | |
Make | Audi | Mercury |
Model | AL2 | Milan |
Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 212 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1925 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2730 mm |