2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2009 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2009 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Sequoia (272 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 197 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2009 Toyota Sequoia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Toyota Sequoia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Toyota Sequoia. (315 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Toyota Sequoia.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2009 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Audi | Toyota |
| Model | AL2 | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 4664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 272 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 315 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
