2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2010 Chrysler 300
To start off, 2010 Chrysler 300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2010 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chrysler 300 (339 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2010 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2010 Chrysler 300 | |
| Make | Audi | Chrysler |
| Model | AL2 | 300 |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 339 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3048 mm |
