2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (123 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Colorado. (207 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Colorado. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Colorado has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Colorado will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | AL2 | Colorado |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 207 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |