2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (358 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 283 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1143 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Jeep Commander is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jeep Commander. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (527 Nm) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.

Compare all specifications: