2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 6 weights approximately 601 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 6. (226 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | AL2 | 6 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 226 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1501 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2789 mm |