2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2010 Nissan NP300
To start off, 2010 Nissan NP300 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,486 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan NP300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan NP300 (131 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2010 Nissan NP300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan NP300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan NP300. (304 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan NP300. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 2010 Nissan NP300 has manual transmission. 2010 Nissan NP300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2010 Nissan NP300 | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | AL2 | NP300 |
Year Released | 2001 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2486 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 304 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2960 mm |