2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,384 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. (230 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Captiva. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 2012 Chevrolet Captiva has manual transmission. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | AL2 | Captiva |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 230 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2707 mm |