2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu (169 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Malibu. (217 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2012 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | AL2 | Malibu |
Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2852 mm |