2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2012 Holden UTE
To start off, 2012 Holden UTE is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 282 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2.
Because 2012 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi AL2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2012 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2. 2001 Audi AL2 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden UTE has manual transmission. 2012 Holden UTE will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Audi AL2 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2012 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | AL2 | UTE |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 357 HP |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
