2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2012 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Lincoln MKS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lincoln MKS (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 198 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lincoln MKS should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Lincoln MKS weights approximately 983 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Lincoln MKS (366 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2012 Lincoln MKS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2012 Lincoln MKS | |
| Make | Audi | Lincoln |
| Model | AL2 | MKS |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 366 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1883 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2868 mm |
