2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2012 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2012 Subaru Outback is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Subaru Outback (170 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Subaru Outback weights approximately 717 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Subaru Outback is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Subaru Outback. (230 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2012 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Audi | Subaru |
| Model | AL2 | Outback |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1617 kg |
