2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Equinox is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox (180 HP @ 6700 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Equinox should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 805 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox. (233 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Equinox.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2013 Chevrolet Equinox | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | AL2 | Equinox |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 233 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1705 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2857 mm |