2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu (187 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Malibu weights approximately 670 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi AL2 (330 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Chevrolet Malibu. (244 Nm). This means 2001 Audi AL2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2013 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | AL2 | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 244 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1570 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2738 mm |
