2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XJ (503 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 428 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 980 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jaguar XJ (625 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2013 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi AL2 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
| Make | Audi | Jaguar |
| Model | AL2 | XJ |
| Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | W |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 503 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 625 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3157 mm |
