2001 Audi AL2 vs. 2013 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2013 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Audi AL2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Audi AL2 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 301 more horse power than 2001 Audi AL2. (75 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi AL2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1814 kg more than 2001 Audi AL2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Toyota Sequoia is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Audi AL2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Sequoia will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Sequoia (544 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Audi AL2. (330 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Audi AL2.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi AL2 | 2013 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | AL2 | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2001 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1199 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 544 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 2714 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3100 mm |