2001 Audi Allroad vs. 1942 Cadillac 60
To start off, 2001 Audi Allroad is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Cadillac 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Cadillac 60 would be higher. At 5,671 cc (8 cylinders), 1942 Cadillac 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Cadillac 60 (148 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 2001 Audi Allroad. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Cadillac 60 should accelerate faster than 2001 Audi Allroad. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Cadillac 60 weights approximately 30 kg more than 2001 Audi Allroad. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Audi Allroad is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1942 Cadillac 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi Allroad will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi Allroad | 1942 Cadillac 60 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | Allroad | 60 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1942 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2496 cc | 5671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 3230 mm |