2001 Audi Steppenwolf vs. 1952 Holden FX
To start off, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Holden FX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Holden FX would be higher. At 3,189 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Audi Steppenwolf is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf (220 HP) has 169 more horse power than 1952 Holden FX. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf should accelerate faster than 1952 Holden FX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Holden FX weights approximately 70 kg more than 2001 Audi Steppenwolf.
Because 2001 Audi Steppenwolf is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Holden FX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi Steppenwolf (325 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Holden FX. (136 Nm). This means 2001 Audi Steppenwolf will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Holden FX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi Steppenwolf | 1952 Holden FX | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | Steppenwolf | FX |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3189 cc | 2166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 325 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2620 mm |
