2001 Audi TT vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1951 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (220 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi TT weights approximately 800 kg more than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (285 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Audi | Jeep |
Model | TT | CJ3A |
Year Released | 2001 | 1951 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2040 mm |