2001 Audi TT vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1963 Holden EJ. (64 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1963 Holden EJ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi TT weights approximately 776 kg more than 1963 Holden EJ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Holden EJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (285 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Holden EJ. (163 Nm). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Holden EJ.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi TT | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | Audi | Holden |
| Model | TT | EJ |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1780 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2680 mm |
