2001 Audi TT vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 430 kg more than 2001 Audi TT.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi TT | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Audi | Oldsmobile |
| Model | TT | Starfire |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1781 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 3130 mm |
