2001 Audi TT vs. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 790 kg more than 2001 Audi TT.
Because 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2001 Audi TT | 1965 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Audi | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | TT | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2001 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1786 cc | 6230 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 161 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 109 L |
