2001 Audi TT vs. 1967 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1967 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 1967 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | TT | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2001 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |