2001 Audi TT vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (220 HP) has 167 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi TT weights approximately 930 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Zastava 1300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (285 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | TT | 1300 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 93 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2430 mm |