2001 Audi TT vs. 1981 Zastava 132
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Audi TT (220 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Audi TT weights approximately 815 kg more than 1981 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Audi TT (285 Nm) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2001 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 1981 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Audi | Zastava |
Model | TT | 132 |
Year Released | 2001 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1780 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2560 mm |