2001 Audi TT vs. 1982 Bristol Brigand
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bristol Brigand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bristol Brigand would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bristol Brigand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bristol Brigand weights approximately 368 kg more than 2001 Audi TT.
Because 2001 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Bristol Brigand. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bristol Brigand has automatic transmission and 2001 Audi TT has manual transmission. 2001 Audi TT will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bristol Brigand will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 1982 Bristol Brigand | |
Make | Audi | Bristol |
Model | TT | Brigand |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 81.1 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1390 kg | 1758 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2910 mm |