2001 Audi TT vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 2001 Audi TT is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,779 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Audi TT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Minica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Minica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2001 Audi TT | 1982 Mitsubishi Minica | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | TT | Minica |
Year Released | 2001 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 546 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 29 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |